|
Flat Panels
Video Projectors Rear-Projection TV Receivers Speakers Disc Players Surround Pre/Pros Amplifiers Accessories Recently Added
Video Displays
Speakers
Sources
Electronics
Accessories Scott Wilkinson Thomas Norton Fred Manteghian Kim Wilson How To Features Audio/Video News Past eNewsletters CEDIA 2008 CES 2008 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 CES 2007 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 CES 2006 Thomas J. Norton Michael Fremer Joel Brinkley Scott Wilkinson Dealer Locator AV Links Contact Us Flatscreen TVs LCD TVs Plasma TVs HDTV AV Receivers Home Theater in a Box Digital Projectors DLP Projectors Video Projectors Surround Sound Dolby 5.1 |
Westinghouse TX-52F480S LCD HDTV
Westinghouse is one of the most venerable consumer-appliance brands in American history, so it's no wonder the company has gotten into the LCD TV game in a big way. I've reviewed several Westinghouse sets, and I've seen steady improvement with each generation.
The TX-52F480S is the latest and largest LCD TV offered by the company, and it's got a lot going for it. Even better, it's priced at only $2500, far less than premium 52-inchers. Can it compete with those big-dog brands? Let's see...
Features These days, many LCD TVs refresh the image at twice the normal rate—120Hz instead of 60Hz—in order to reduce motion blur. The Westinghouse uses a refresh rate of 60Hz, no doubt to keep the cost down. With 1920x1080 native resolution, it can accept all signals including 1080p/60 and 1080p/24, though it applies 3:2 pulldown to 1080p/24. The Standard aspect-ratio mode is supposed to map each pixel in a 1080i or 1080p signal to the corresponding pixel in the display, which eliminates any chance of degrading the picture by overscan scaling. With a 1080i signal, however, I found that a few pixels were cropped from the top and bottom, and there were signs of vertical overscan scaling in some test patterns. This was not evident with a 1080p signal. One of the touted features is a function called Autosource, which automatically switches to the input that's receiving a signal. This might seem like a good idea, but it's not. What happens if more than one input is receiving a signal? I found out the hard way—it switches unpredictably. It's far better to leave this function off and switch inputs manually.
Article Continues: User Interface »
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
